"He is top of the tree, inspirational and instinctively brilliant. He knows the law backwards and is a beautiful draftsman." "Richard has an encyclopaedic knowledge of all the big cases, because he's been in a good number of them."Chambers and Partners 2019
Richard enjoys the unique distinction of having twice been made Chambers and Partners’ Family Law Silk of the Year. He won this in 2010 / 11 and again in 2013 / 14. He is also the only specialist matrimonial Silk, still in practice, to have been nominated for The Lawyer’s overall barrister of the year. He has been short-listed three times (2014 (third), 2012 (when he lost out in the final cut to Robert Jay QC (counsel to the Leveson Enquiry) and 2011 (missing out to Jonathan Sumption QC now Justice Sumption of the Supreme Court)).
Both Chambers & Partners and the Legal 500 rank him in the top category of Family Silks. Richard is in the “Star” category for the current Chambers and Partners guide (a distinction enjoyed by only three barristers in this, the highest category).
Richard has also been described as the “star of the Family Bar” by the Legal 500.
Spears Wealth Magazine described him as “simply the best”.
He is also recommended by City Wealth and The Directory of Experts. He was Family Law Silk of the Year for The Economist / Law Monthly (2011, 2012 and 2013) and for Acquisition International (2012 and 2013).
Richard was born in Gosport and then variously lived in Merseyside, Glasgow, London and Suffolk. He was educated at the Royal Hospital School (Greenwich Scholarship) and Trinity College, Oxford (Keasby Scholarship). He was the highest placed in the Oxford University examinations in Public International Law (Hugh Belott Prize-winner), second in Family Law and third in Land Law. He was also placed in the first class in Jurisprudence. He won the Astbury Scholarship at the Middle Temple and the Gottlieb Prize in Bar Finals. He was called to the Bar in July 1988. Richard passed the Hong Kong Barrister’s Qualifying Exam in 2012 (he was the only candidate to pass in that year and one of only five to ever pass that famously demanding exam). He is the only Family barrister to ever pass the Chancery Judge’s specialist exam (being one of 9 successful candidates out of 897 candidates).
He acted for Mrs Katrin Radmacher in the Supreme Court case of Radmacher v Granatino  UKSC 42 and for Mrs Yasmin Prest in the Supreme Court case of Petrodel Resources Ltd et al v Prest  UKSC 34.
He is a Deputy High Court judge and a Recorder. Judicially he undertakes work in the Family Division and is also “ticketed” for Chancery and QBD work. work.
He is called to the Bars of England & Wales and Hong Kong (where he practises out of Temple Chambers, Hong Kong). He has also been called (ad hoc) to the Bar of the Cayman Islands.
Publications: Since 1989 Richard has been the co-author of “Practical Matrimonial Precedents” (2 Volumes), Sweet & Maxwell. It is now in its 49th release (2016).
Richard also co-authored, “Essential Family Practice” (2 Volumes), Butterworths and “At Court”, FT Law & Tax. Richard is also an Editor of Jowitt’s Dictionary of English Law.
Together with his wife, Elisabeth (also a member of chambers) he is co-author of “Relationship Agreements” Sweet & Maxwell (2013).
He has also had published articles in Family Law, Family Matters, The Family Law Journal and The Lawyer. He has occasionally contributed to The Law Society’s Legal Network Television. In 2000 he was shortlisted (list of four) for UNICEF’s Lawyer of the Year for his work on the law relating to paternity disputes.
He has extensively lectured on Big Money Cases, Entitlements Arguments, trust arrangements in Family Law and Nuptial Contracts (both ante and post-nuptial)
Principal areas of practice: High Value Matrimonial Finance; including forum disputes. Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 & Married Women’s Property Act 1882. Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. Drafting Ante-Nuptial Agreements. International trusts disputes.
Has extensively given expert evidence as to English law. Including to the jurisdictions of Australia, Belgium, the Cayman Islands, the Channel Islands, Cyprus, Gibraltar, India, New Zealand, South Africa, Spain and the USA.
Like all the most successful members of the Bar, Richard has a considerable international practice. In addition to being called to the English Bar, he is a full member of the Hong Kong bar and maintains a seat in Temple Chambers, Hong Kong. He is also called ad hoc to the Bar of the Cayman Islands. Richard’s diary is administered centrally whilst the easy availability of flights, video conferencing, emails and so on, means that like so many other international practitioners he is easily able to maintain a highly effective practice internationally.
Education: Royal Hospital School. Trinity College, Oxford. (Law)
Membership: General Council of the Bar (elected Senior Barrister category 1998 – 2001). FLBA (Executive Committee 1998 – 2001). Prosecuting Counsel for the Bar Standards Board. Member of the Advisory Committee to the Law Commission (“Ante-Nuptial agreements” (2011) and “Separate Property Regimes and the General Review of Financial Remedy Applications” (2013)). He has been the annual guest lecturer at Cambridge University and at the Law Society’s Annual General Meeting.
Richard is a bencher of Middle Temple.
Personal: Richard is 52. He was born in Gosport Hampshire. He is married to another member of Chambers, Elisabeth Todd (also a member of the Bar and a part-time Judge). Richard and Elisabeth have four children, two boys and two girls (22, 20, 18 and 16).
Richard used to be a keen back-packer in which capacity he traversed India, USA/Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Nepal (Everest base camp), East Berlin-Brest Litovsk-Moscow-Lenningrad (as then was)-Helsinki-The North Cape-Oslo and completed the Cairo to Cape route. Four children and two very active dogs mean that he tends to stay at home now where his principal hobbies are dispute resolution and history especially the British civil wars 1638 – 1783 and modern (post-1880) conflict. He lists his hobbies in Who’s Who as “laws, wars and the Great Indoors”.
What others say:
Chambers & Partners UK: “Sources praise his command of the law”. “He’s a walking bank of knowledge”. “A Richard Todd pre-nup is as an essential part of the celebrity wedding as booking the Hello photographer”. “A man with a continuingly rising profile, he is exceptionally bright, user-friendly and a recognised expert on prenuptial agreements.” “He has in the last year been increasingly involved in cross-disciplinary and international work.” He “is lauded for his “robust approach and can-do attitude.” “Areas of focus for him include relationship-based financial disputes, many of which involve a trust angle and an international dimension.” “Sources point to his “wonderful Midas touch” and suggest that he is “ideal for a litigious case.”
Chambers & Partners East Asia places him as one of the top three practitioners in China – Hong Kong. “First-class on complex financial relief cases."
The Legal 500 described him as the “star of the Family Bar”, “Exceptional in every respect”; “Enormously talented and client focused. Recommended for high-value matrimonial finance cases. Solid. Immensely clever”. The full 2016 write-up for 1 Hare Court’s barristers reads:
“1 Hare Court is a ‘premier’ family law chambers, with ‘excellent strength and depth at all levels’. It is particularly strong in cases with an international dimension, especially those involving Asia, helped by the fact that Richard Todd QC is called to the Hong Kong Bar.” Of Richard specifically it says, “an original thinker and a dynamic barrister if there ever was one.”
Also recommended by “Legal Experts” and “City Wealth”.
Media Comment :
“Simply the best”, Spears Wealth Magazine.
“Fantastic” The Sunday Times (syndicating from The Tatler)
“A heavyweight Silk” The Lawyer
“One of the toughest legal names” The Evening Standard
“One of the three most influential people in my life” The Times
“Charming and devastatingly clever” The Observer
Richard was The Times Lawyer of the Week, 4 November 2010. (http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/law/article2792399.ece)
- P v P  1 FLR 457
- Marsh v Marsh  1 WLR 744
- Richardson v Richardson (No 1)  1 WLR 196
- Richardson v Richardson (No 2)  2 FLR 617
- H v H  2 FLR 94, Re H  4 All ER 28
- Power v Power  3 FCR 337
- C v C  Fam 70
- Re S  1 FLR 481
- Jones v Jones  3 WLR 1505
- N v N  2 FLR 899
- L v L  2 FCR 412
- Bloch v Bloch  1 FLR 1
- Lambert v Lambert  2 WLR 631, CA,  1 WLR 926 HL,
- Wermuth v Wermuth (No 1)  FLR 1022 and (No 2)  1 FLR 1029,
- Re B  2 FLR 1043,
- Armstrong v Armstrong  2 FLR 481,
- K v K  2 FLR 1137,
- R v R  1 FLR 389,
- T v T  1 FLR 903,
- D v D  2 FLR 825,
- Tracey v Tracey  2 FCR 480,
- GG v L  EWCA Civ 1246
- H v H  2 FCR 663,
- SW v RC  2 FCR663,
- J v P  1 All ER 529,
- NG v KR  1 FCR 35,
- Granatino v Radmacher  Fam Law 183,
- P v P  1 FLR 696,
- Granatino v Radmacher  EWCA Civ 649
- P v P  1 FLR 1126;
- V v V  2 FLR 516;
- Radmacher v Granatino  UKSC 42;
- Mansfield v Mansfield  EWCA Civ 1056,
- Berezovsky v Besharova (17 July 2011) The Times;
- K v L (on the appeal to the Supreme Court)  EWCA Civ 550;
- McTaggart v McTaggart (2011) Cayman Islands Court of Appeal
- Mansfield v Mansfield  3 FCR 167;
- El-Gamal v Al Maktoum  EWHC 827;
- Petrodel v Prest  EWCA 1395;  UKSC 34;
- T v T  EWHC B3;
- SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. FTCW AND OTHERS  HKCA 107; CACV101/2013 (4 March 2014);
- FTCW v. SLKK  HKCA 110; CACV167/2013 (4 March 2014);
- W v M (TOLATA and Anonymity)  EWHC 1679
- TCWF v. LKKS  HKCA 10;  1 HKLRD 896; CACV166/2012 (10 January 2014); TCWF v. LKKS  HKCA 7;  1 HKLRD 896; CACV154/2012 (10 January 2014); SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. FTCW AND OTHERS  HKCFA 34; FAMV10/2014 (23 April 2014); SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. FTCW AND OTHERS  HKCFA 35; FAMV11/2014 (23 April 2014) TCWF v. LKKS  HKCA 176; CACV154/2012 (14 April 2014); RE MARTIN JOHN POINTER QC  HKCFI 343; HCMP3453/2013 (28 February 2014);
- IDC v SSA  HKCA 277;
- SAMUEL TAK LEE v. TSANG, CHIU WING FLORENCE  HKCFI 1484;  1 HKC 185; HCA566/2010 (17 October 2011) ;
- TYH v W  HKCFI 208; SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. FTCW AND OTHERS  HKCA 6;  1 HKLRD 849; CACV101/2013 (10 January 2014) TCWF v. LKKS  HKCA 8;  1 HKLRD 1014; CACV167/2013 (10 January 2014);
- Chai v Peng (No 1), (No 2), (No. 3) and (No. 4)  EWHC 3518 et seq.
- H v W  HKCFI 2296;
- SPH v SA  CFA 56;
- Seagrove v Sullivan  All ER (D) 61;
- LWYA v KYW  HKCA 169;
- LLP v LYWA  HKCA 170;
- Fok Chun Benjamin v Fok Chun Wan Ian et al  HKCA 61 and  HKCA 28.
- Hopkins v Hopkins  EWHC 812;
- Quan v Bray & Anor  EWCA Civ 1401 (14 December 2015); Quan v Bray & Anor  EWCA Civ 1253 (04 December 2015)
- Chai v Peng (No 5)  EWCA Civ 790 AVT v VNT  HKCA 611
- LYAG v YSG  HKCFI 1908 and 1945
- NR v AB & Ors  EWHC 277 (Fam) (22 February 2016)
- Roocroft v Ball  EWCA Civ 1009
- Z v Z and Ors  EWHC 1720
- Al Baker v Al Baker  EWHC 1720
- A v B  FCMC 10937/2013
- CWG v MH and ors  HKCA 276, 277 and 279
- DX v LN (No 1)  HKCA 66
- CYYC v TVKT  HKFAMC 7
- DX v LN (No 2)  HKCA 71
- A v B  HKFAMC 15
- Chai v Peng (2017) The Times, 7th April 2017